Your old library, now built
for the answer engines.

The eighteen criteria cover every structural property answer engines look for when choosing what to cite. Six are visible in the page hero: short summary, direct opening answer, question style headings, FAQ block, page data tags, topic coverage. The other twelve include answer depth, internal linking, originality, freshness, source attribution, brand voice, comparison tables, and metadata. Each is scored individually.

The old version sits on the left, the rewritten version on the right, and every change is highlighted with its reason. The team can scroll both columns in sync, click any change to see the criterion it addresses, and approve or reject each. The workflow is the same as reviewing a writer's edit: accept what works, reject what does not. The full diff is the deliverable, not a black box.

The URL, the underlying argument, the brand voice and the substantive claims stay untouched. The structure, opening summary, heading shapes, FAQ block and page data tags get adjusted where they fall short. Ranko is not rewriting what the article says, just how it is structured to be quotable. Source quotes stay verbatim, product details stay intact. What changes is the AEO scaffolding, not the substance.

Every refresh is stored as a versioned change, so reverting is simply rolling back. When a page is refreshed, the previous version is preserved in full: every paragraph, heading, tag and metadata field. The published article switches to the new version, but the old one remains stored. One click reverts immediately. Multiple refreshes create a history the team can roll back to any point in.

Yes, bulk operations are supported and most teams with substantial libraries use them. The team can select multiple pages from the dashboard: all below a threshold, all in a cluster, all older than a date, and run the refresh across the selection. Side by side rewrites are generated for every page, and URL preservation and reversibility apply identically across bulk and single page refreshes.

Article Writer produces new articles answer engine ready. Page Refresher brings existing articles into the same shape. Together they cover the whole library: new content arrives in the right shape, and existing content gets brought up to standard. The same eighteen criteria score both, so standards stay aligned. Most teams use Article Writer for the calendar and Page Refresher for the legacy backlog.